Many corporations have in the recent times made a decision that they will stop giving stock options to their employees. It is believed that such corporations have made that decision in order for them to save money and avoid losses. Jeremy Goldstein who is an experienced business attorney stated that although these corporations have the right to not offer such options, there are reasons why they should consider them. According to him, there are three major reasons as to why corporations chose not to offer their employees stock options. Jeremy Goldstein says that many employees fear that they may not exercise the stock options in the case that the stock value of a company goes down. The company will also need to cater of the associated expenses and that the stockholders risk the option of overhanging incised of low stock value.
According to Jeremy Goldstein, majority of employees have become aware of the new compensation methods. They understand that their options can be rendered worthless by various economic and therefore opt for other benefits. Many employees have likened the stock options to casino tokens which are normally unpredictable most of the times. Although offering employees stock options has its disadvantages, Jeremy Goldstein says that it also has its advantages which normally outweigh the disadvantages. Firstly, Stock options are termed to be better as opposed to equities, better insurance coverage or even additional wages. Stock option is also a good compensation method since it gives the employees the value they require.
Jeremy Goldstein is a successful business attorney who is one of the United States’ most respected lawyers. Currently, Jeremy serves as a partner in a law firm called Jeremy L. Goldstein & Associates, LLC. The firm was founded several years ago and has so far changed the lives of numerous people living in the United States.
To learn more, visit http://officialjeremygoldstein.com/.